Skip to main content

This page has been translated using TexTra by NICT. Please note that the translation may not be completely accurate.
If you find any mistranslations, we appreciate your feedback on the "Request form for improving the automatic translation ".

Web Accessibility validation Results

Conduct tests in accordance with JIS X 8341-3:2016 and publish the results.
The notation of "compliance" in the results of this validation is based on the notation specified in the "JIS X 2016-3:2016 Notation Guidelines for Web Content Compliance - April 2021 Edition" by the Web Accessibility Foundation Committee of the Information and Communications Access Council. (https://waic.jp/docs/jis2016/compliance-guidelines/202104/) 8341

Test Results for Success Criteria for Target Conformance Level

ItemContent
Expression DateApril 1, 2024 (2024)
Standard number and revision year of the standardJIS X 8341-3:2016
Compliance level metPartially compliant with A
A brief description of the target Web pagehttps://www.digital.go.jp/ All the following pages, https://form-www.digital.go.jp/contact
List of web content technologies relied uponHTML, CSS, JavaScript, PDF
Check tool used for the testNu Html Checker, Adobe Acrobat Pro, axe-core
Operating systems, user agents, and assistive technologies used to validation contentWindows10 / Google Chrome / NVDA, Windows10 / Adobe Acrobat Reader / NVDA, iOS17.4 / Safari / VoiceOver
Method of selecting web pages to be tested40 pages (web pages: 30 pages, PDF:10 files) by random sampling, and 14 pages and PDF1 files were selected as representative of the set of web pages
Web page on which the test was performedWeb Accessibility validation Results Test Implementation Page List
Success Criteria ChecklistSuccess Criteria Checklist
Test PeriodFrom March 8 to March 25, 2024 (2024)
Additional measures beyond the success criteria to improve accessibilityPut a "Go to Text" link at the top of each page

Success Criteria Checklist

  • In the "Applicable" column, "0" indicates that the Success Criteria apply, and "-" indicates that the Success Criteria do not apply.
  • In the "Results" column, validation results are marked with "0" for Success Criteria that are met, and "X" for Success Criteria that are not met.
  • Refer to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 External Links Glossary for terms used in Success Criteria.

Success Criteria Checklist

No.Success CriteriaConformance LevelApplicationResultsNotes
1.1.1Nontextual contentA0XSome PDFs contain images without alternate text.
1.2.1Audio only and video only (recorded)A-0No applicable content
1.2.2Caption (included)A00
1.2.3Audio description or alternative content for media (prerecorded)A00
1.2.4Caption (Live)AA-0No applicable content
1.2.5Audio Description (Prerecorded)AA00
1.3.1Information and RelationshipsA0X"Some documents have list items that are not marked up as a list." or "Some PDFs do not have markup and bookmark settings."
1.3.2A meaningful orderA00
1.3.3Sensuous featuresA-0
1.4.1The use of colorA00
1.4.2Vocal controlA00
1.4.3Con Trust (minimum level)AA00
1.4.4Resize TextAA00
1.4.5Text imageAA-0No applicable content
2.1.1Keyboard operationA00
2.1.2No keyboard trapA00
2.2.1Timing adjustableA-0No applicable content
2.2.2Pause, Stop, and HideA-0No applicable content
2.3.1Three flashes or less than the thresholdA-0No applicable content
2.4.1Block skipA00
2.4.2Page TitleA0XSome PDFs don't have titles
2.4.3Focus OrderA0XOn the site search and search results page, there is an inappropriate focus order.
2.4.4Purpose of the link (in context)A00
2.4.5More than one meansAA00
2.4.6Headings and LabelsAA00
2.4.7Visualization of FocusAA00
3.1.1Page LanguageA0XSome PDFs do not have language settings
3.1.2A partial languageAA00
3.2.1On FocusA-0No applicable content
3.2.2On inputA-0No applicable content
3.2.3Consistent navigationAA00
3.2.4Consistent distinctivenessAA0XInconsistent labeling of pagination within a site
3.3.1Error IdentificationA00
3.3.2Label or descriptionA00
3.3.3Error Correction SuggestionsAA00
3.3.4Error avoidance (legal, financial and data)AA-0No applicable content
4.1.1Syntactic analysisA00
4.1.2Name, role, and valueA0XYour location is not shown in the pagination on the search results page for on-site searches

The Issue found by the test and the direction toward its solution

As a result of the test, we recognize that there are the following Issue, and we will continue to work to solve each Issue.

Issue found in web pages

  1. Some list items are not marked up as a list (Success Criterion 1.3.1 Information and Relationships)
    In order to resolve the above Issue, we will continue to improve the flow of creating web pages, various guidelines, and an accessibility confirmation system.
  2. The following Issue (s) were identified in on-site searches and search results.
    In order to resolve the Issue, we will continue to consult and coordinate with the operators who provide the on-site search function.
    • On the search form and search results page, keyboard focus has an improper focus order (Success Criterion 2.4.3 Focus Order).
    • The pagination at the bottom of the search results page does not show your current location (Success Criterion 4.1.2 name, role, and value).
    • Similar features and labels on other pages within the site are not consistent (Success Criterion 3.2.4 Consistent Distinctiveness).

Issue found in PDF files

  1. A file was identified in which alternate text for an image was not properly provided (Success Criterion 1.1.1 Non-Text Content)
  2. Markup and bookmarks may not be set. This may make it difficult for screen reader users to understand the content of the document. (Success Criterion 1.3.1 Information and Relationships)
  3. Untitled file identified (Success Criterion 2.4.2 Page Title)
  4. A file with no language setting was identified (Success Criterion: Language on page 3.1.1)

Overview of accessibility by data type

Agenda, minutes, and conference materials

Since a complicated layout is rarely used, it is considered that accessibility can be secured, but it is difficult to use it in a screen reader because tags, language settings, and file titles are not assigned.

Efforts to Improve Accessibility
  • Add a heading to help you understand a longer sentence accurately or move more smoothly through a document
  • In long sentences such as minutes, a summary is provided at the beginning to make it easier to understand the whole.
Presentation materials
  • It is not tagged and cannot be read by a screen reader
  • It is often laid out freely on the slide, so you need to tag it and adjust the reading order so that a screen reader can understand it
    • There are many documents with too much information in one slide, so it may take time to improve readability.
    • In some cases, it is difficult to make the reading order easier to understand by adjusting the reading order alone.
Efforts to Improve Accessibility
  • Prepare separate materials for posting on the website
    • Simplify the content by reducing the amount of information per slide
    • Provide text data and web pages as alternative content for slides
Other Issue
  • It was confirmed that tools for creating manuscripts had no text information or tags, making it extremely difficult to ensure accessibility.
  • It was confirmed that the working environment (OS or font) damaged text information regardless of the original file or creation tool.

In order to solve these problems, we will continue to develop a flow for creating PDF documents, various guidelines, and an Issue verification system.