Skip to main content

This page has been translated using TexTra by NICT. Please note that the translation may not be completely accurate.
If you find any mistranslations, we appreciate your feedback on the "Request form for improving the automatic translation ".

Local governments Study Meeting on Common Functions, etc. concerning Unification and Standardization of core business systems in Issue (1st)

Update History

Overview

  • Date and Time: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 (2024) from 11:00 to 12:00
  • Location: Online Meeting
  • Agenda:
    1. Opening
    2. Opening Remarks
    3. Material Description
      1. Issue's response policies
      2. Roles of the Issue Study Group for Common Functions, etc.
      3. Sharing of Issue and operator opinions on the latest flag and history number
      4. Future Directions
    4. Q &
    5. Office Communication
    6. Adjournment

Materials

Relevant policies

Minutes

Disclosure shall be made in the form of minutes because there is a possibility of causing disadvantages to specific companies and members, etc., such as referring to cases related to specific companies, etc. to which members belong.

Material Description

Digital Agency explained Issue's solution policies on data connections, the roles of the Issue Study Group on Common Functions, etc., and the future schedule. The outline of the explanation is as follows.

  • In order to realize a safe system transition by the end of FY 2025, which is the standardization deadline, matters related to the competitive areas that have not been described in the Standard Specifications for Common Functions or the Standard Specifications for Data Requirements and Collaboration Requirements shall be resolved through consultation between business operators as before. In addition, the elaboration of the Standard Specifications, etc. shall be examined in FY 2026 or later based on the status of the standardized data connections at the end of FY 2025. transition
  • Based on the opinions of the operators that it is possible to flexibly solve problems according to the business characteristics by utilizing the experience and expertise that the operators have so far, and that it is better not to unify the setting method of the history number and the latest flag due to concerns about the impact on the system that is currently in development and the possibility of rework, we presented the policies this time.
  • The Issue Review Meeting on Common Functions, etc. will be used as a forum for sharing matters to be discussed among operators and prior examples of consultations between operators, and Digital Agency will support the smooth progress of consultations between operators.

Questions and Opinions

The main questions and opinions of the attendees are as follows.

  • Member : In order to prevent discrepancies in recognition between business operators, could it be possible to present references, etc. regarding the method of setting the latest flag and history number?
  • Member : What is the concept of conformity regarding the specifications detailed after fiscal 2026?
    • Secretariat : In order to make the specifications detailed after fiscal 2026, it is necessary to collect information first. We would also like to consider when it is necessary to conform to the detailed specifications after hearing the opinions of the operator and local government.
  • Observer : We would like to position the consultation between carriers as a consultation between each package development carrier, rather than a consultation between SIer and on-site applicable carriers on a field-by-field basis, and start the consultation after identifying the package carriers that need cooperation and the details of the cooperation.
  • Member : How should the subject of consultation between carriers be considered?
    • Secretariat : Among the items that are not described in the Standard Specifications for Common Functions or the Standard Specifications for Data Requirements and Collaboration Requirements, those that are considered necessary for Package Release should be adjusted through consultation between business operators.
  • Member : Who is assumed to make the final decision when it becomes difficult to adjust through consultation between business operators?
  • Member : In the case where standardization transition is not in time due to consultation between business operators, should it be difficult to make transition?
  • Member : We would like you to consider informing the policies to the local local government.
    • Secretariat : If it is difficult to make adjustments, basically, it is considered that the decision of the local government using the package is necessary. If the characteristic of transition is difficult, it is assumed that the application will be made through the municipality. In addition, we would like to consider the timing of the notification to the local government.

End